Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrss
≡ Menu

2. Derivative evidence

Review of a published court of appeals decision; case activity (including briefs) Issues (composed by On Point from the PFR) Does the inevitable discovery doctrine require the State to show that information gained through police misconduct did not prompt or influence the purportedly lawful investigation? Does the inevitable discovery doctrine require the State to show that it… Read More

{ 0 comments }

State ex rel. Rockie L. Douglas v. Brian Hayes, 2015 WI App 87; case activity (including briefs) Douglas’s probation was improperly revoked based on his refusal to answer his probation agent’s inquiry about Douglas’s suspected involvement in various criminal activities while on probation because he was not sufficiently informed, prior to his refusal, that he had… Read More

{ 1 comment }

State v. Mastella L. Jackson, 2015 WI App 49, petition for review granted, 10/8/15, affirmed, 2016 WI 56; click here for briefs This decision is SCOW bait. Police in Outagamie County engaged in what the court of appeals called “reprehensible” actions while interrogating the defendant. “Outraged” the circuit court suppressed the defendant’s statements to police and… Read More

{ 0 comments }

State v. Danny G. Harrell, 2008 WI App 37 For Harrell: Patrick M. Donnelly, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding: Expert opinion that Harrell is sexually violent was derived from his compelled, incriminatory statement and therefore also inadmissible, ¶¶14-35. The court essentially tracks the discussion in Mark, which therefore won’t be repeated, and applies it to the particular facts… Read More

{ 0 comments }

State v. Charles W. Mark, 2008 WI App 44; on appeal following remand in State v. Mark, 2006 WI 78, 292 Wis. 2d 1, 718 N.W.2d 90 For Mark: Glenn L. Cushing, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding1: ¶20      When an individual has given an involuntary statement, a subsequent statement is also considered involuntary unless it can be “separated… Read More

{ 0 comments }

State v. Charles W. Mark, 2008 WI App 44; on appeal following remand in State v. Mark, 2006 WI 78, 292 Wis. 2d 1, 718 N.W.2d 90 For Mark: Glenn L. Cushing, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding1: ¶28      In Kastigar, the … Court stated that, once a defendant demonstrates that he or she has testified under a grant of… Read More

{ 0 comments }