Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrss
≡ Menu

2. Preliminary questions

State v. Aaron Schaffhausen, 2014AP2370-CR, District 3, 7/14/15 (not recommended for publication); case activity (including briefs) It was error for the circuit court to tell jurors at the mental-responsibility phase of Schaffhausen’s NGI trial that they would decide whether a defense psychiatrist and psychologist were qualified as expert witnesses, but the error was harmless. In addition, the circuit court… Read More

{ 1 comment }

State v. Michael Perzel, III, 2011AP1190-CR, District 4, 12/1/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Perzel: Waring R. Fincke; case activity Blood test results are admissible without expert testimony to reflect a person’s bac at the time in question (in this OWI-related prosecution, at the time Perzel was driving), so long as… Read More

{ 1 comment }