Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrss
≡ Menu

Character — Extrinsic Proof, § 906.08(2)

State v. Troy D. Moore, 2002 WI App 245
For Moore: Suzanne L. Hagopian, SPD, Madison Appellate

Issue/Holding: Extrinsic evidence offered by the state solely to bolster a witness’s credibility, by showing that he had provided reliable information leading to the arrests of other drug dealers, violated § 906.08(2). ¶15. (Note: the court holds open the question of whether such evidence might be admissible under § 904.04(2). ¶15 n. 2.)

Facebooktwitterlinkedinmail
{ 0 comments… add one }

Leave a Comment