Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrss
≡ Menu

“Does an innocent man have the right to be exonerated?”

So asks the title of an excellent article published on The Atlantic’s website, which lays bare the flaws of the reasoning and result in Youngblood v. Arizona, 488 U.S. 51 (1988), by relating the details of the case and Youngblood’s ultimate, almost happenstance, exoneration. As noted here, the Wisconsin Supreme Court is reviewing whether the Wisconsin constitution’s due process guarantee requires greater protection than that afforded under Youngblood. For another in-depth and far more academic discussion of Youngblood, see Norman C. Bay, Old Blood, Bad Blood, and Youngblood: Due Process, Lost Evidence, and the Limits of Bad Faith, 86 Wash. U. L. Rev. 241 (2008).

Facebooktwitterlinkedinmail
{ 0 comments… add one }

Leave a Comment