Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrss
≡ Menu

Double Jeopardy – Multiplicity: perjury – testimony during same proceeding, multiple counts

State v. Roger L. Warren, 229 Wis. 2d 172, 599 N.W.2d 431 (Ct. App. 1999)
For Warren: Daniel F. Snyder

Holding: Warren’s perjured testimony at a single hearing dealing with a single general subject supports multiple perjury counts, because each charge dealt with different perjured details and is therefore “different in fact” if not law. In other words, “different evidence is required to establish that Warren responded falsely to the questions upon which” the separate counts are based.

Facebooktwitterlinkedinmail
{ 0 comments… add one }

Leave a Comment