Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrss
≡ Menu

Due Process – Sex Offender Registration Juvenile – Constitutionality

State v. Jeremy P., 2005 WI App 13
For Jeremy P.: Adam B. Stephens

Issue/Holding: Because mandatory sex offender registration for certain juvenile offenders, §§ 938.34(15m)(bm) and 301.45(1m), is not punishment it does not violate procedural due process, ¶¶8-15. The court’s retention of discretion in administering registration defeats a substantive due process claim, ¶22. An equal protection argument, based on claim of children-as-supsect-class, is also rejected, ¶¶23-29.

Facebooktwitterlinkedinmail
{ 0 comments… add one }

Leave a Comment

Next post:

Previous post: