Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrss
≡ Menu

Forfeiture — Constitutionality — § 346.65(6)

State v. Lance Terry Konrath, 218 Wis.2d 290, 577 N.W.2d 601 (1998), affirming unpub. decision
For Konrath: Ralph A. Kalal

Issue/Holding: Forfeiture statute § 346.65(6) authorizes a civil, remedial in rem proceeding, and is not facially unconstitutional; because the statute is civil, double jeopardy doesn’t apply; the proceeding provides sufficient notice to satisfy due process (with caution that immediate seizure appropriate in certain circumstances).

Facebooktwitterlinkedinmail
{ 0 comments… add one }

Leave a Comment