Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrss
≡ Menu

Gambling, § 945.03(5) — Constitutionality — Vagueness Challenge

State v. Lester E. Hahn, 221 Wis. 2d 670, 586 N.W.2d 5 (Ct. App. 1998)
For Hahn: Bruce Elbert

Issue/Holding: The meaning of “gambling machine” is sufficiently well-understood as to survive a vagueness challenge. (The court reserves whether “contrivance” might be vague when applied to facts not raised by this case.)

Facebooktwitterlinkedinmail
{ 0 comments… add one }

Leave a Comment