Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrss
≡ Menu

Motion in Limine as Preserving Failure to Object to Closing Argument

State v. Paul Venema, 2002 WI App 202
For Venema: Randall R. Garczynski

Issue/Holding: Failure to object to portions of closing argument didn’t waive right to challenge them on appeal, where defendant obtained a “definitive pretrial ruling” which “served to preserve (his) position for appeal.” ¶25 n. 9.

Facebooktwitterlinkedinmail
{ 0 comments… add one }

Leave a Comment