Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrss
≡ Menu

Prior Consistent Statement, § 908.01(4)(a)2

State v. Earl L. Miller, 231 Wis.2d 447, 605 N.W.2d 567 (Ct. App. 1999)
For Miller: Eduardo M. Borda

Issue: Whether a prior consistent statement is admissible where the declarant hasn’t been specifically cross-examined about his/her prior statement.

Holding: The requirement in § 908.01(4)(a) that the prior consistent statement declarant be subject to cross-examination concerning the statement requires only the opportunity for cross-examination, and not an actual inquiry into the area. ¶42.

Facebooktwitterlinkedinmail
{ 0 comments… add one }

Leave a Comment