Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrss
≡ Menu

Privilege – Confidential Informant, § 905.10(3)(b) – Procedure for Disclosing

State v. Marc Norfleet, 2002 WI App 140
For Norfleet: Alan D. Eisenberg

Issue/Holding: Once the trial court reasonably determines that disclosure of an informant’s identity is required, there is no need to hold an in camera hearing, ¶¶13-14.

Facebooktwitterlinkedinmail
{ 0 comments… add one }

Leave a Comment