≡ Menu

J. Sanctions on Appeal

court of appeals decision (3-judge, not recommended for publication); for Voeller: Steven G. Richards; BiC; Resp.; Reply Counsel – Sanction – Appendix ¶9 n. 3: Contrary to the State’s certification, the appendix does not include the trial court’s findings or opinion. The transcript of the oral findings and opinion should have been included in the… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Patrick M. Zurkowski, No. 2009AP929-CR, District III, 6/22/10 court of appeals decision (3-judge, not recommended for publication); for Zurkowski: Michael J. Fairchild; BiC; Resp. 1st-Degree Intentional Homicide – Sufficient Evidence, Intent ¶13      That Zurkowski killed June through a combination of repeated blows and cutting her tongue with a ceramic object he crammed in her… Read more

{ 0 comments }

S.C. Johnson v. Milton E. Morris, 2010 WI App 6, PFR filed 12/30/09 Issue/Holding: ¶5 n. 1: We note that neither Russell’s nor Buske’s appellate counsel properly cite to the record. Record cites are often missing. An appellate court is improperly burdened where briefs fail to consistently and accurately cite to the record. Meyer v… Read more

{ 0 comments }

court of appeals decision Inadequate Appendix to Appellate Brief ¶5 n. 1:  We note that neither Russell’s nor Buske’s appellate counsel properly cite to the record. Record cites are often missing. An appellate court is improperly burdened where briefs fail to consistently and accurately cite to the record. Meyer v. Fronimades, 2 Wis. 2d 89, 93-94, 86 N.W.2d… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Werner v. Hendry, 2009 WI App 103, PFR filed 7/17/09 Issue/Holding: ¶11      As a final matter, we observe that the appellant’s appendix fails to include the trial court’s reasoning. It is essential that the appendix include the record items truly relevant and essential to understanding the issues raised, particularly the trial court’s oral ruling. State… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Briefs – Content – Tone: Ad Hominem

Bettendorf v. St. Croix County, 2008 WI App 97 Issue/Holding: An appellate “brief contain(ing) a collection of attacks against [opposing counsel] that are nothing more than unfounded, mean-spirited slurs” subjects its author to ethical sanction: ¶17      “A lawyer should demonstrate respect for the legal system and for those who serve it, including judges, other lawyers… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Philip R. Bons, 2007 WI App 124, PFR filed 4/24/07 Issue/Holding: ¶23      Applying the plain language of the rule, Gorokhovsky’s certification of compliance is false. His appendix contains only a copy of the judgment of conviction, the notice of motion and motion to suppress, and the notice of intent to pursue postconviction relief… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Briefs – Citing Unpublished Opinion

State v. Juan F. Milanes, 2006 WI App 259, PFR filed 12/7/06For Milanes: Joan M. Boyd Issue/Holding: ¶21      … Further, appellate counsel cited an unpublished case in her opening brief, contrary to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(3). This does not appear to be inadvertent, since the citation ends with the parenthetical “(unpublished).” Our supreme court has… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS