court of appeals decision; for Jeffrey A.W.: Hans P. Koesser Resp Br; Reply Counsel – Adequacy of Investigation Attempt to demonstrate absence of herpes in defendant—an issue central to this sexual assault prosecution—was, although failure, not product of deficient performance, ¶12: There is no question that trial counsel’s investigation yielded the wrong information. But that… Read more
1. Deficient performance
court of appeals decision (1-judge; not for publication) Delinquency – Venue Delinquency venue is where the juvenile resides, § 938.185(1)(a), which is where the legal custodian establishes the child’s domicile; legal custodian of Jennifer Z. was Taylor Co. Human Services, therefore she resided in Taylor Co. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel – Eliciting Incriminating Testimony Counsel’s… Read more
State v. Jeffrey A.W., 2010 WI App 29; for Jeffrey A.W.: Hans P. Koesser Adequacy of Counsel Investigation Counsel’s attempt to demonstrate the absence of herpes in the defendant—an issue central to this sexual assault prosecution—was, although a failure, not the product of deficient performance. ¶12 There is no question that trial counsel’s investigation yielded… Read more
Failure to Object/Seek Admissibility; Guilty Pleas/Plea Bargains; Jury Instructions; Jury Selection; Sentencing; Prejudice; Litigating IAC Claims; IAC and Interest of Justice; Sanctions; Malpractice Claim… Read more
Johnbull K. Osagiede v. USA, 543 F.3d 399 (7th Cir 2009) Issue/Holding: Counsel’s ignorance of rights available, under VCCR Art. 36, to her Nigerian national client was deficient: Osagiede’s claim is a common one in Sixth Amendment cases. In essence, Osagiede argues that his lawyer should have been aware of his legal rights under Article 36 and… Read more
Johnbull K. Osagiede v. USA, 7th Cir No. 07-1131, 9/9/08 Issue/Holding: Counsel’s ignorance of VCCR Art. 36 rights available to foreign national client was deficient: Osagiede’s claim is a common one in Sixth Amendment cases. In essence, Osagiede argues that his lawyer should have been aware of his legal rights under Article 36 and should have… Read more
State v. Paul Dwayne Westmoreland, 2008 WI App 15, PFR filed 1/17/08 For Westmoreland: Joseph E. Redding Issue: Whether counsel’s strategic decision to argue inconsistent theories during closing argument (the defendant wasn’t involved in the shooting, but if the jury found he was then they should find guilt only on a lesser offense) was deficient. Holding: ¶20 We start… Read more
State v. Jason K. Van Buren, 2008 WI App 26; for Van Buren: Waring R. Fincke Issue: Whether trial counsel’s failure to adduce expert testimony on false confessions was deficient. Holding: ¶18 Here, we do not address the prejudice prong of Strickland because we conclude that Van Buren’s counsel was not deficient. A finding of deficient performance “requires showing… Read more
