≡ Menu

Published 2001

State v. Debra Noble, 2001 WI App 145, reversed, other grounds, State v. Debra Noble, 2002 WI 64For Noble: Jeff P. Brinckman Issue: Whether failure to cite relevant authority in support of appellate argument establishes waiver. Holding: ¶11 … But Noble cites no authority requiring a tape recording, a transcript, or a signed statement to… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. John Casteel, 2001 WI App 188, PFR filed Issue: Whether defendant is entitled to have reviewed on the merits issues that either were, or could have been, raised on prior appeals. Holding: ¶13. On appeal, Casteel raises three arguments, two of which we previously have addressed. He provides no reasoning why he could… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. William Nielsen, 2001 WI App 192, PFR filed For Nielsen: Waring R. Fincke Issue/Holding: ¶20. Our review of a claimed discovery violation under Wis. Stat. § 971.23 is subject to a harmless error analysis. See State v. Koopmans, 202 Wis. 2d 385, 396, 550 N.W.2d 715 (Ct. App. 1996). The test of harmless… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Anthony J. Leitner, 2001 WI App 172, affirmed on other grds., 2002 WI 77, 253 Wis. 2d 449, 646 N.W.2d 341 For Leitner: Jim Scott Issue: Whether the defendant waived his right to object to trial court reliance on certain information by failing to lodge a contemporaneous objection. Holding: ¶41 … When the prosecutor subsequently argued… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Stanley A. Samuel, 2001 WI App 25, 240 Wis. 2d 756, 623 N.W.2d 565, affirmed, other grounds, 2002 WI 34 For Samuel: Robert R. Henak Issue: Whether the defendant waived objection to the sentencing court’s reliance on information sealed from the defendant’s inspection. Holding: ¶42 We accept the State’s waiver argument. First, just because the… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Michael W. Carlson, 2001 WI App 296 For Carlson: Steven L. Miller Issue/Holding: Erroneous impaneling of a juror who, because he could not understand English, should not have been seated, wasn’t harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. ¶46. The harmless error rule adopted last term by this court in State v. Harvey, 2002 WI… Read more

{ 0 comments }

County of Milwaukee v. Edward S., 2001 WI App 169, PFR filed For Edward S.: Richard D. Martin, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether the 14-day deadline set by § 51.20(7)(c) for final hearing is extendible when delay is caused by the respondent’s own action. Holding: The otherwise mandatory deadline for final commitment hearing is waivable when the… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Thomas Wenk, 2001 WI App 268, PFR filed 10/31/01 For Wenk: Michael K. Gould, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue: Whether trial court denial of a petition for conditional release from an NGI commitment was an erroneous exercise of discretion. Holding: Although the state expressed doubt that it had met its burden of proof, the trial… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS