≡ Menu

5. Evidence

State v. Michael Scott Long, 2009 WI 36, affirming in part and reversing in part unpublished opinion For Long: Joseph L. Sommers Issue: Whether use of force element of second-degree sexual assault was established where the defendant asked the complainant to rate his penis then hugged her so that she could feel his penis through… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Jeffrey A. Warbelton, 2009 WI 6, affirming 2008 WI App 42 For Warbelton: Paul G. Lazotte, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding: On a trial for stalking, § 940.32, where one of the elements is prior conviction for “violent crime,” the defendant may blunt prejudicial impact of proof of the prior by stipulating to the existence of the… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Steven P. Muckerheide, 2007 WI 5, affirming unpublished opinion For Muckerheide: Mark S. Rosen Issue/Holding: On a trial of homicide by intoxicated use of a motor vehicle, § 940.09(1)(b), where the defense was that the death would have occurred anyway because the deceased grabbed the wheel just prior to the accident, evidence that the deceased “had… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Obea S. Hayes, 2004 WI 80, affirming 2003 WI App 99, 264 Wis. 2d 377, 663 N.W.2d 351 For Hayes: Philip J. Brehm: Issue/Holding: ¶64. We agree with the court of appeals that M.M.’s testimony did not follow a chronological order. A reasonable factfinder could, however, draw the inference that the defendant verbally… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Eugene M. Perkins, 2004 WI App 213, PFR filed 11/9/04 For Perkins: Jeffrey W. Jensen Issue Whether expert testimony is required to establish the victim’s mental illness, an element of § 940.225(2)(c). Holding: This element may be shown through credible lay opinion testimony: ¶17 Here, the State had to prove four things: (1)… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Evan Zimmerman, 2003 WI App 196, (AG) PFR filed 9/10/03 For Zimmerman: Keith A. Findley, UW Law School Issue/Holding: Although “most of the persuasive evidence against” Zimmerman was his own statements and alibi; and although a conviction may not be based solely on a negative inference drawn from the defendant’s own version, other evidence… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS