State v. Salvador Cruz, 2010AP911-CR, District 2, 10/13/10 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Cruz: Matthew S. Pinix; BiC; Resp.; Reply Evidence of the effect of the defendant’s (alleged disorderly) conduct was relevant, without a showing of “proximity” to that conduct: ¶13 A.S. instructs that “[i]n addition to considering the potential effects of a defendant’s… Read more
9. Crimes
State v. Daniel H. Hanson, 2010 WI App 146 (recommended for publication), affirmed 2012 WI 4; for Hanson: Chad A. Lanning; case activity Fleeing, § 346.04(3) Can you criminally “flee” the police, if what you’re actually doing is driving to the nearest police station to escape what you believe to be a beating at the hands… Read more
court of appeals decision (recommended for publication); for Batt: Chad A. Lanning; BiC; Resp.; Reply OWI – Implied Consent Law – § 343.305(5)(a) Testing Construing State v. Stary, 187 Wis. 2d 266, 522 N.W.2d 32 (Ct. App. 1994), the court concludes that the Implied Consent law affords the driver the right to choose testing administered by… Read more
decision below: unpublished; prior On Point post; for Burris: Byron C. Lichstein Issue (from Table of Pending Cases): Was the trial court’s supplemental jury instruction that was issued in response to a question from the jury and that quoted verbatim from a Supreme Court opinion an impermissibly misleading instruction under the standards established by State v… Read more
federal habeas decision (pdf file: here), granting relief in State v. Fischer, 2010 WI 6; respondent’s Rule 59 motion to amend judgment denied 1/7/11 Habeas Review – Right to Present Defense – Expert Opinion, Based PBT Preventing Fisher from adducing expert opinion he wasn’t driving with a prohibited alcohol content based on analysis of his PBT… Read more
State v. David J. Bucknell, 2010AP833-CR, District 3, 9/30/10 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Bucknell: Rebecca M. Coffee; BiC; Resp.; Reply A prior conviction, used to enhance a pending charge, may be collaterally attacked on the basis of denial of the 6th amendment right to counsel. Because “it is clear from… Read more
Door County v. Andrew M. LaFond, 2010AP976, District 3, 9/28/10 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for LaFond: Robert C. Raymond; BiC; Resp.; Reply The court rejects an argument that a driver has a due process right to be informed that a blood sample can be taken forcibly upon refusal to consent to… Read more
State v. Richard Martin Kubat, 2010AP509-CR, District 3, 9/21/10 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Kubat: Marc Grant Kurzman; BiC; Resp. Battery – Self-Defense – Sufficiency of Evidence A verbal confrontation between truckers at a truck stop eventuated in Belcher disabling Kubat’s truck and inviting Kubat to get his punk ass out… Read more
