≡ Menu

3. Before sentencing

Plea-Withdrawal – Pre-Sentence – Generally

State v. Jarmal Nelson, 2005 WI App 113 For Nelson: Wm. J. Tyroler, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue/Holding: ¶11      “A defendant seeking to withdraw a plea of guilty or no contest prior to sentencing must show that there is a ‘fair and just reason,’ for allowing him or her to withdraw the plea.” State v. Kivioja… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Jeremy K. Morse, 2005 WI App 223 For Morse: Amelia L. Bizarro Issue/Holding: ¶10      Here, the record reflects that Morse failed to demonstrate either a statutory or a Bangert violation. The plea hearing addressed all the appropriate issues and contains no statutory violations. The plea was extensive and complete. The fact that Morse… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Jarmal Nelson, 2005 WI App 113 For Nelson: Wm. J. Tyroler, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue/Holding: Given that the record established Nelson’s ignorance of the potential for commitment as a sexually violent person (ch. 980) as a result of his guilty pleas, the trial court’s conclusion that he presented a “fair and just” reason… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Jarmal Nelson, 2005 WI App 113 For Nelson: Wm. J. Tyroler, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue: Whether, after Nelson demonstrated a “fair and just” reason for pre-sentencing plea withdrawal, the State satisfied is concomitant burden of showing “substantial prejudice” in order to defeat the motion, where the principal complainant could no longer be found… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Jeremy K. Morse, 2005 WI App 223 For Morse: Amelia L. Bizarro Issue: Whether Morse was entitled to plea-withdrawal on the basis of claimed newly discovered evidence, in the form of taped jail conversations between inmates discussing his case, and certain police reports. Holding: The trial court’s findings that the tapes were inadmissible… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Anthony J. Leitner, 2001 WI App 172, affirmed on other grounds, 2002 WI 77 For Leitner: Jim Scott Issue: Whether the trial court properly denied a presentence motion to withdraw guilty plea. Holding: ¶27. When a defendant shows a fair and just reason, the trial court should permit the plea withdrawal unless there… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Adrian L. Williams, 2000 WI 78, 236 Wis. 2d 293, 613 N.W.2d 132, affirming unpublished decision of court of appeals For Williams: Ellen Henak, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue: Whether “this court [should] adopt a new rule of procedure, which would require that if a trial judge anticipates exceeding the state’s sentence recommendation under… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. George R. Bollig, 2000 WI 6, 232 Wis. 2d 561, 605 N.W.2d 199, affirming State v. Bollig,, 224 Wis.2d 621, 593 N.W.2d 67 (Ct. App. 1999) For Bollig: Thomas E. Knothe, Collins, Quillin & Knothe, Ltd. Issue: Whether the trial court should have granted Bollig’s pre-sentencing motion to withdraw guilty plea based on… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS