Custodian of Records for Legislative Technology Services Bureau v. State, 2004 WI 65, reconsideration denied, 2004 WI 149 Issue/Holding: ¶11 Wahl contends that Wis. Stat. § 13.96, as it interacts with Wis. Stat. § 905.01, creates a statutory privilege that, while not expressly stated, is implicit in LTSB’s obligation to treat all information within its possession as… Read more
Follow Us
On Point
by the Wisconsin State Public Defender
Important Posts!
- SCOW will decide whether DA improperly commented on defendant’s decision not to testify
- Defense win! COA reverses default recommitment
- Defense wins! Initial commitment and recommitment reversed due to D.J.W. and evidentiary errors
- SCOW takes up ch. 51 adjournments and circuit court competency (again)
- SCOW will address evidence required for involuntary med orders under Sell and 971.14
Ahead in SCOW
October 3rd
9:45 State v. Garland Barnes, 2018AP2005-CR
October 6th
9:45 State v. Charles Richey, 2021AP142-CR
October 10th
9:45 State v. Robert Nietzold, 2021AP21-CR
October 11th
Petitions Conference here
October 12th
9:45 State v. Corey T. Rector, 2021AP1213-CR
November 8th
9:45 State v. Jeffrey Hineman, 2020AP226-CR
10:45 State v. Percy Antoine Robinson, 2020AP1728-CR
November 16th
Petitions Conference here
November 29th
9:45 State v. Daimon Von Jackson, 2019AP2383-CR
10:45 State v. Jovan T. Mull, 2020AP1362-CR
Contact Us
On Point is sponsored by the Wisconsin State Public Defender. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email Colleen Ball at [email protected] or Jefren Olsen at [email protected]
Disclaimer
On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.
This site rocks the Classic Responsive Skin for Thesis.