≡ Menu

8. Curtilage

Warrantless Arrest – Curtilage – Porch

State v. Gary F. Wieczorek, 2011AP1184-CR, District 3, 11/8/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Wieczorek: James R. Koby; case activity Warrantless arrest of Wieczorek on his front porch for OWI, after he answered the officer’s knock was constitutional. The record doesn’t show that Wieczorek had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the porch. ¶¶10-11… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Ralph H. Davis, 2011 WI App 74 (recommended for publication); for Davis: Chandra N. Harvey, SPD, Madison Appellate; case activity Warrantless Entry – Curtilage – Implied Invitation Doctrine ¶9      The protections of the Fourth Amendment extend beyond the walls of the home to the “curtilage.” Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 170, 180… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Consent to Search

State v. Robert L. Stokes, 2009AP919-CR, District 1, 2/1/11 court of appeals decision (3-judge, not recommended for publication); for Stokes: John M. Bolger; case activity; Stokes BiC; State Resp.; Reply Given trial court credibility findings, the resident’s consent to the police to enter and search was voluntary. ¶19      Finally, we are not convinced by Robert’s argument… Read more

{ 0 comments }

seventh circuit decision Milwaukee’s ordinance-created “winter rules” with respect to snow removal effectively establish an “easement” such that police could enter a yard and rifle through a homeowner’s garbage cart. Although the  cart is within what is normally considered “curtilage,” and thus protected by privacy concerns, the intrusion of the curtilage here is “lawful,” given this local law allowing garbage… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Walter Leutenegger, 2004 WI App 127 For Leutenegger: Bill Ginsberg Issue/Holding: ¶21 n. 5: The State does not challenge the circuit court’s holding that the garage was part of the curtilage of Leutenegger’s house and subject to the warrant requirement. This implicit concession appears appropriate in this case. Published decisions on this topic consistently hold that… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Thomas G. Martwick, 2000 WI 5, 231 Wis.2d 801, 604 N.W.2d 552, reversing unpublished decision For Martwick: Robert P. Rusch Issue: Whether plants found on Martwick’s property were within his curtilage, and therefore subject to the warrant requirement, or in “open fields.” Holding: The plants were in open fields, outside the curtilage, and therefore could be… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Michael Wilson, 229 Wis.2d 256, 600 N.W.2d 14 (Ct. App. 1999) For Wilson: Martha A. Askins, SPD, Madison Appellate. Issue/Holding: Officer’s invasion of home’s curtilage, where he smelled marijuana burning inside, held unlawful. Court enumerates various factors relevant to extent of curtilage protection, and stresses that fourth amendment protects both home and area around… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS