≡ Menu

a. DNA

Sentencing Discretion: DNA Surcharge

State v. Scott R. Long, 2011 WI App 146 (recommended for publication); for Long: Jeff T. Wilson; case activity DNA surcharge, conditioned on Long not having previously provided sample or having paid surcharge, upheld as proper exercise of discretion: ¶8        Here, the circuit court ordered the DNA sample contingent on whether one had previously been provided.  If… Read more

{ 0 comments }

DNA Surcharge – Timeliness of Challenge

State v. Raymond Allen Nickel, 2010 WI App 161 (recommended for publication); pro se; State Resp.; Robert R. Henak, WACDL, Amicus Brief Nickel’s challenge to his DNA surcharge was untimely, because made outside the direct appeal time limits: ¶5        When a defendant moves to vacate a DNA surcharge, the defendant seeks sentence modification.  Pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 973.19, a… Read more

{ 0 comments }

court of appeals decision; pro se; Resp. Br. Sentence Modification – DNA Surcharge ¶2        Singleton was sentenced on July 24, 2002, and the circuit court ordered, as a condition of his bifurcated sentence, that Singleton provide a DNA sample and pay the applicable surcharge.[1] Singleton’s sole challenge is made via a motion to modify his… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Order for DNA sample and surcharge Click here for certification order For Mathis: Donna Odrzywolski We [District IV] certify this appeal to the Wisconsin Supreme Court pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.61 (2007-08), to resolve a conflict among the districts of the court of appeals that has arisen as a result of our decision in… Read more

{ 0 comments }

DNA Surcharge – Generally

State v. Ray Shawn Cherry, 2008 WI App 80 For Cherry: John T. Wasielewski Issue/Holding: ¶5        The statutes governing this issue are clear. If a trial court sentences a defendant to a felony involving a sex crime contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 940.225, 948.02(1) or (2) 948.025, or 948.085, the trial court must order the defendant to pay… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Ray Shawn Cherry, 2008 WI App 80 For Cherry: John T. Wasielewski Issue: Whether the sentencing court properly exercised discretion in imposing a DNA surcharge, where it misconstrued such action as mandatory rather than permissive and ignored the defendant’s prior such assessment. Holding: ¶9        We hold that in assessing whether to impose the DNA… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Franciollo L. Jones, 2004 WI App 212, PFR filed 11/11/04 For Jones: Syovata Edari; Ellen Henak (on PFR), SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue: Whether the trial court properly ordered Jones to pay a DNA surcharge even though he had already provided a DNA sample in an earlier case. Holding: ¶5 WISCONSIN STAT. § 973.047 obligates the… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS