≡ Menu

Mitchell v. Wisconsin oral argument: commentary and transcript

Scotusblog’s Amy Howe has published this post about today’s oral argument in Mitchell v. Wisconsin, which addresses the constitutionality of our implied consent statute’s authorization for taking a blood sample from an unconscious person. A transcript of the argument is here.

{ 1 comment… add one }
  • Charles D. Wingrove April 24, 2019, 4:32 pm

    Jerry has given me permission to discuss the case. Of interest, had the DA assert the inevitable discovery rule, the issue herein never would have presented.

Leave a Comment

RSS