≡ Menu

f. Trial court authority

State v. Richard J. Nelson, 2014AP1794-CR, District 3, 2/24/15 (one-judge decision; ineligible for publication); case activity (including briefs) While the victim’s injuries could have been caused by the alleged conduct for which Nelson was acquitted, they could also have been the result of the conduct for which Nelson was convicted. Thus, there was a basis for finding a… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Lance F., 2014AP1881-FT, 12/23/14, District 2 (1-judge opinion; ineligible for publication); case activity A circuit court lacks authority to order a juvenile (who had been found delinquent for battery, disorderly conduct and physical abuse of a child) to make restitution of the victim’s missing property, where he was never charged with theft of the property, he never admitted to… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Patrick L. Hibl, 2013AP2723-CR, District 2, 6/4/14 (1-judge; ineligible for publication); case activity Rejecting challenges to a restitution order, the court of appeals holds that the evidence in the record established a nexus between the crime Hibl was convicted of and the victim’s loss and that the circuit court took account of his ability… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Question presented: What, if any, causal relationship or nexus between the defendant’s conduct and the victim’s harm or damages must the government or the victim establish in order to recover restitution under 18 U.S.C. § 2259? Lower court opinion: In re: Amy Unknown: United States v. Paroline, 701 F.3d 749 (5th Cir. 2012) Docket Scotusblog… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Devante J. Lumpkins, 2012AP1670-CR, District 1, 4/2/13; court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); case activity Lumpkins is liable for restitution for damage to a stolen van he and two co-defendants (“The Jack Boys”) used to commit two armed robberies, even though Lumpkins was not charged with or convicted of the theft… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Alberto Fernandez, 2009 WI 29, on certification For Fernandez: Eileen A. Hirsch, Shelley M. Fite, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding: ¶61      Fernandez says the court erred by ordering full restitution to two insurance companies because a court is authorized to do so only where justice requires. Fernandez says that justice does not require a man… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Alberto Fernandez, 2009 WI 29, on certification For Fernandez: Eileen A. Hirsch, Shelley M. Fite, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding: ¶52      The State counters that there is no language in the statute that requires victim claims to be submitted before sentencing. The State also argues that where restitution was held open, there is no expectation… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Jeremy T. Greene, 2008 WI App 100, PFR filed 7/14/08 For Greene: Kristen D. Schipper Issue: Whether the sentencing court may order that DOC distribute “gifted” (as opposed to wage-based) funds in a prisoner’s account to satisfy a restitution obligation. Holding: ¶12      We observe that Wis. Stat. § 973.20 does not limit the consideration of… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS