≡ Menu

Evidence sufficient to establish disorderly conduct

City of New Richmond v. Warren Wayne Slocum, 2016AP1887, District 3, 10/11/17 (one-judge decision; ineligible for publication); case activity (including briefs)

Slocum unsuccessfully challenges the sufficiency of the evidence used to find he violated a New Richmond municipal ordinance, § 50.88(a)(1), which tracks § 947.01(1).

Slocum claims he was engaged in the orderly service of legal process on Burke, the town clerk. The evidence, however, showed Slocum went to Burke’s house during the evening, between 8 and 10 p.m., rang Burke’s doorbell incessantly, shook the door handle repeatedly, and walked around the house peering in windows, leading Burke’s wife to believe someone was attempting to break into the residence and to call 911. This evidence supports the finding Slocum was disorderly. (¶¶11-20).

{ 0 comments… add one }

Leave a Comment