Sentence – Consecutive Terms – Exercise of Discretion, Generally

by admin on February 23, 2009

State v. Todd W. Berggren, 2009 WI App 82, PFR filed 6/24/09
For Berggren: Robert G. LeBell

Issue/Holding: The sentencing court need not state separately why it chooses consecutive rather than concurrent terms; rather, this determination is made by considering the same factors as inform sentence length, ¶¶45-46.

{ 0 comments… add one }

Next post: Wtits – Certiorari – Inmate Complaint – Limitation on Discovery

Previous post: Sentence – Review – Exercise of Discretion, Generally

Sentence – Consecutive Terms – Exercise of Discretion, Generally

Contact Us

Disclaimer